There are few things we British love more than to see one of our elite institutions with egg on its face.
So of course news that an Oxford college is at the centre of a “Harlem Shake Scandal” has made national headlines. (Full disclosure: it’s of more than passing interest to me as it concerns my old college).
But I made some inquiries, and the story’s not quite as it at first seems.
To recap: A group of students took over the library at St Hilda’s and recorded their version of the now rather passé meme doing the rounds on YouTube.
So far, so vaguely humourous. But then it emerged that not only had participating students been disciplined, the young library assistant on duty that night had lost her job.
“Dismissed”, “fired” – however it was reported, the punishment sounded harsh. Especially as the students insisted that the woman, Calypso Nash, had nothing to do with the stunt.
Cue furious demands for her immediate reinstatement. An online petition was followed by a motion passed by the undergraduate body, the JCR. There was even an Early Day Motion tabled in Parliament.
I found it hard to believe. And sure enough, there were some key details missing from the coverage – which the College did nothing to clarify while the story was gathering steam. “Declined to comment” was the line most newspapers used.
Ms Nash was not a “librarian” and she was not on the staff. She’s a post-graduate student who was employed on a casual basis as a library invigilator.
After the Harlem Shake incident she was told she wouldn’t be offered any more shifts. A bit harsh perhaps but not quite the same as being “fired” from a job, and, though nothing’s been heard from her, I’m told she has not appealed.
If the college had said that at the beginning it might have defused the protest. I gather they’re about to make a statement to that effect. Horses and stable doors come to mind…
It still leaves questions about the overall handling of the incident. No students were harmed in the making of that 30 second video and I doubt any degrees will be failed as a result.
It was recorded late in the evening, and in a spirit of fun. It even had an admirable political message: a banner demanding freedom for the jailed Russian women from the band Pussy Riot.
The students could have been told to do a morning’s filing, or picking up litter or carrying books back to shelves. Something for their community as a way of the college authorities saying gently, “don’t do that again.” As for Ms Nash, if the rest of her work in the library is okay then of course she should be offered more shifts.
The college should learn to be a little less po-faced and a little more communicative with the media, not to mention with its own student body.
And MPs lodging Early Day Motions should perhaps check their facts.